No like-for-like public cost comparison is available for Smart, CBB and Maxxia: their cited pages do not provide comparable administration-fee amounts or employer procurement quotes.[3][4][5][6] Use public information to shortlist by sector and employee access, then compare written proposals on total fees, payroll handoffs, reconciliation, security and exit.

Smart, CBB and Maxxia: published scope to confirm
Smart
- Sector fit: Smart describes services across corporate, government, healthcare, mining, not-for-profit and education employers.[3] Its Queensland page describes a government-employee service; confirm the current employer arrangement and eligible employee categories.[6]
- Employee access: Smart describes an app for benefit balances, transactions, claims and packaging details.[3] Ask for a demonstration of the actual employer package and onboarding process.
- Fees: The cited page states that conditions and fees apply without supplying a comparable employer procurement price.[3] Require a binding fee schedule.
CBB
- Sector fit: CBB describes support for not-for-profit employers across Australia.[4] Confirm the legal employer entity and workforce eligibility; this description is not independent evidence of market exclusivity.
- Employee access: Its page names Beyond Bank as a packaging-card provider and describes benefit categories.[4] Confirm available app, portal, support and onboarding functions.
- Fees: Obtain administration, card, claim, implementation and exit charges; the cited page does not provide a comparable full procurement quote.[4]
Maxxia
- Sector fit: Maxxia describes healthcare, charity, government, education and corporate services; available benefits depend on the employer and require approval.[5]
- Employee access: Its application process uses personal, payroll, pay-cycle and bank details before benefit selection and submission.[5] Confirm employer-specific onboarding and exception handling.
- Fees and tax treatment: Maxxia describes administration fees as depending on the benefit and employer agreement.[5] Obtain the actual amount, payer, deduction method, GST and cap treatment. Confirm FBT treatment for the employer and benefit under the applicable rules rather than assuming a provider’s general fee description applies universally.[2]
These vendor descriptions support enquiries about operational fit, not a ranking of quality or savings. Obtain written confirmation for the employer entity, workforce locations, employee categories and proposed benefit mix.[3][4][5]
Set the procurement baseline
Salary packaging is an employer–employee agreement under which the employee receives less pre-tax income and the employer provides benefits of similar value.[1][2] An effective arrangement must be agreed before the relevant work is performed and leave the employee without access to the sacrificed salary.[2]
Before appointing an administrator, confirm employee eligibility, employment or industrial-agreement constraints and the treatment of each benefit under current applicable rules.[2] Salary packaging does not remove the employer’s super guarantee obligations, and packaged fringe benefits can create an employer FBT liability.[1][2] Include a named owner for FBT inputs and reconciliation; an administration provider does not determine the employer’s tax position merely by operating deductions.
What to confirm with each provider
The cited Smart, CBB and Maxxia pages leave the following procurement terms unconfirmed.[3][4][5][6]
- Total fees: employer implementation and setup charges; employee and benefit fees; card and claim charges; commission amounts; minimum billing or employee numbers; volume discounts; indexation; and GST treatment.
- Payroll handoff: file formats, payroll-system integrations, transfer methods, cut-off dates, remittance timing, validation, acknowledgement files, rejected deductions and correction procedures.
- Reconciliation and service controls: report frequency, general-ledger outputs, deduction-to-remittance reports, employee balances, FBT reconciliation, audit controls, service levels and error-resolution times.
- Contract and exit: initial term, minimum commitment, renewal, notice periods, cancellation charges, switching assistance, data return and employee offboarding.
- Information security: certifications, named security standards, hosting location, access controls and breach-notification and response commitments.
Give each bidder the same workforce profile and benefit mix, then request a binding fee schedule and worked annual total-cost scenario.
Test payroll and reconciliation controls
Maxxia describes a high-level payroll handoff: each pay cycle, payroll deducts the employee’s nominated pre-tax amount and sends it to Maxxia, which applies the funds to selected benefits. The remaining salary is taxed and deposited normally.[5] Treat this as an overview, not an interface specification.
Before launch, require:
- Interface documentation: file layout, API or secure-transfer method, employee identifiers, validation rules and acknowledgement files.
- Named responsibilities: ownership of file creation, approval, transmission, funding, rejected records, corrections and escalation.
- Scenario testing: insufficient pay, unpaid leave, mid-cycle termination, duplicate deductions, rejected files, retrospective corrections and benefit changes after cut-off.
- Reconciliation evidence: redacted deduction-to-remittance, employee-balance, claims, exception, liability and general-ledger reports.
- Control evidence: a trace from opening balances through deductions, remittances, benefit payments, fees and corrections to closing balances.
- FBT and service processes: timetables, data fields, responsibilities, report dates, reconciliation tolerances, response targets and escalation levels.
Ask each bidder to demonstrate a realistic exception rather than only a standard pay cycle. Make successful acceptance testing and named payroll owners on both sides conditions of launch.
Put switching and termination terms in the contract
Require the contract to specify:
- the initial term, renewal mechanism, notice window, termination rights and early-exit charges;
- assistance obligations and accountable owners during a provider switch;
- the treatment of pending claims, unused balances, cards, novated leases, scheduled deductions and final pays;
- deduction stop and start dates, parallel reconciliation and employee communications;
- the records to be returned, their format, timing and cost; and
- data deletion, privacy, hosting and breach-response commitments.
Choose through a scored procurement process
Use a weighted scorecard covering sector eligibility, employee onboarding and support, evaluated total cost, payroll compatibility, reconciliation evidence, service controls, security and exit terms. Mark unanswered requirements as unverified, and treat critical payroll, reconciliation, security and offboarding controls as pass-or-fail.
- Shortlist providers whose stated sectors cover the employer and workforce.
- Issue the same workforce profile, benefit mix, pay-cycle scenarios and contract questions to every bidder.
- Require written proposals, demonstrations and payroll testing against one evaluation record.
- Check references from employers with comparable sectors, workforce sizes, pay frequencies and payroll complexity. Vendor-hosted testimonials should not replace independent checks.
- Do not appoint a provider until fees are binding, sample reports reconcile, service levels are contractual and exit obligations are documented.
The choice should rest on demonstrated operational fit, accountable controls and evaluated total cost—not an employee savings calculator or promotional lease quote.
References
- moneysmart.gov.au (moneysmart.gov.au)
- Salary sacrificing for employees | Australian Taxation Office (ato.gov.au)
- Australia's Leading Salary Packaging Provider | Smart (smart.com.au)
- CBB (cbb.com.au)
- Salary Packaging in Australia: Benefits & Calculator | Maxxia (maxxia.com.au)
- QLD Smartsalary (smartsalary.com.au)